Sunday 1 May 2011

newsletter - May 2011


Morden Tavern
Please oppose the proposed redevelopment of Morden Tavern

 Developers have submitted a planning application for Morden Tavern.

They wish to build:

  • Sixteen flats
  • Ten three bedroom houses and one four bedroom house.
  • Two shop units.
  • Five flats in the top of the Pub


This will have implications for all those who live near to the Morden Tavern site.

 You can view the plans at the planning office, or go online to the Merton Planning website and enter the planning reference number: 10/P1231
http://planning.merton.gov.uk/MVM/Online/PL/ApplicationSearch.aspx

You have until 22nd June raise concerns with the planning office

WE NEED YOUR LETTERS

Please write to the planning office – the more letters they receive the less likely it will be approved
Councils now have more power to reject this development.
Anyone from anywhere in the world can write in to complain.

Send letters to Jonathan Lewis, with copies to Tony Ryan, Planning Dept. Civic Centre, Morden, SM4 5DX.

See over for reasons to say NO!

Here are some reasons to say no. You may have some of your own. Please use all of them in your letter
  • The development is directly opposite a primary school entrance. The development will lead to an increase in traffic and on road parking. This cannot be in the interest of safety for parents and children coming to and from school.
  • Willows residents and the proposed development at Morden Tavern will be excluded from using the CPZ. This means any surplus cars from these new developments will have to be parked in areas of the estate not currently covered by a CPZ. Lack of off road parking provision will lead to increases in pressure on existing parking areas especially in evenings and weekends. At present weekend and evening parking ‘overflows’ bays on to single yellow line areas of the roads. The changes shortly to be made of the CPZ with all single yellows to become double will exasperate the current problems with parking leading to ‘street conflict’. Many more residents will pave over their front gardens to makes private parking provision, reducing bay area’s even more and fundamentally changing the look and feel of the street and neighbourhood.
  • Style and design of proposed houses do not match existing housing for the street. They will tower over the rest of the street looking completely out of place with roof heights one whole storey above the existing street.
  • Height of houses will cause ‘shadow’ during late afternoons and evenings on to gardens of houses.
  • High raised flats proposed for Central Road will be mean flat residents can look directly down and into existing housing causing a sever loss of privacy currently enjoyed by these homes.
  • Flats on central road will be one and half storeys above the existing housing on that side of Central road.
  • Currently soft landscape of pub garden (trees) absorb noise from the pub. The ‘hard’ surfaces of the proposed housing and flats, removal of trees will cause sound to rebound (echo) significantly around the existing housing causing noise and disturbance from the pub to become a nuisance.
  • The occupation density of the plans is significantly greater than that of the current surrounding streets. The plans are more fitting a central urban development than a residential neighbourhood.
  • It is hard to see how the pub could continue to operate given the close proximity of the proposed housing. The pub is an important part of the local community and enjoys much support. It would be sad to see such a facility disappear as it would destroy the community cohesion of the area. There is also a danger after this that the ‘retail space’ remains empty and the car park etc becomes dilapidated.
  • The application to have the pub use changed from A1 to A4 should be denied to prevent future changes of use to this property away from a licensed premises. This if granted opens up the danger of large commercial supermarkets moving in and opening up ‘express style’ stores. This could force local shops to close, leaving them empty and derelict, costing the community jobs. It also goes against the original covenant for the estate which guarantees a pub premises. This is the only pub left so any change to allow other uses apart from A4 would be a breach of the original covenant.
  • If the development goes ahead as proposed it will have a significant negative impact on property values in the area and a lowering of the overall quality of life enjoyed currently by residents.
  • There are bats roosting in the outbuildings on the site as well as in the main building. A full Bat survey is required and plans need to protect all existing bat roosts. The proposed plans would destroy the bat roosts completely.
·         The development proposal seems designed to maximise the prophets of the developers at the expense of the local community. Although refurbishment and enhancement of the pub area is desirable it should not come at the expense of a hitherto quiet and relaxed suburban neighbourhood.  Development of the pub garden area would not be of benefit to anyone in the community except the developer and force the eventually closure of the pub.