Licensing Act 2003 - Application for a Premises Licence

Our worst fears realised, but not very surprising as this is what the council suggested in 2009.

Local Resident's response to 'Controlled Drinking Zone'

Dear Editor

"I believe that existing legislation and CDZ provisions give the police adequate powers to confiscate alcohol from persons found drunk and disorderly or otherwise deemed likely to cause a breach of the peace/public nuisance in our borough. Giving the police any wider discretion to confiscate alcohol would seem disproportionate, and only likely to alienate some otherwise peaceful members of the community.

If there is concern about alcohol related anti-social behaviour, may I suggest that the Council should be less accommodating to new supermarket convenience stores applying to sell cheap alcohol for extended hours. Over the last 20 years about half the pubs in South Wimbledon, Mitcham and Morden have closed and instead we have a surfeit of shops selling bulk branded lagers, strong ciders and discounted spirits as loss leaders.

Indeed, at what was until last year the Grove Tavern, opposite South Wimbledon tube station, Tescos are now applying to sell alcohol from 6am until midnight. There's already a Tescos at the garage just up the Broadway and there's a new Sainsbury's in the old tile shop across the high street from the Grove. I don't see why you need to allow Tescos at the Grove to sell any alcohol at all. Forget about a borough-wide CDZ; just get a grip, please, on these vulture supermarket chains."

Geoff Strawbridge
Merton resident

Response from SHPG regarding the Controlled Drinking Zone in Merton

29/3/13

Dear Editor,

It was with bemusement that we received the letter from Chris Lee informing all Merton Residents that Merton Council is consulting on making the whole of Merton a ‘designated public place’ ‘due to reported alcohol related anti-social behaviour’

Given that Chris Lee’s department have presided over a lamentable lack of foresight to protect Merton’s dwindling public houses from conversion into shops and flats and in the case of the Morden Tavern actually facilitating this change, failing to use the toothless Pub Protection Policy L16 with no public consultation of residents.

They now want to request an extension of their powers to deal with a problem they have clearly created themselves. If you allow such a rapid drop in Public House provision in the borough is it any wonder that there is in an increase of drinking in public spaces.

If this department had been more proactive in preventing public house closures and listened to what the residents of Merton wanted then they would have saved our money on this unnecessary Orwellian step backwards.

What a painful letter for the residents of the St Helier estate to receive given that the council enabled the loss of our last public house.

SHPG
(St Helier Pub Group)

Morden Tavern loss is 'devastating blow' article - Wimbledon Guardian 31/10/12

http://www.wimbledonguardian.co.uk/yoursay/news/10016988.Morden_Tavern_loss_is_devestating_blow/

Our response to the Wimbledon Guardian article (Pub defenders were 'naive' to suggest co-operative)

It was with bemusement that the SHPG read Mr Clarke’s letter, ‘Morden Tavern defenders were 'naive' to suggest co-operative’, 10th October - http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/yoursay/yournews/wimbledon/9976178.Pub_defenders_were__naive__to_suggest_co_operative/. In the two years in which the Campaign has been running, he has never taken the opportunity to share his superior knowledge with us or sought to influence the future of this community asset, but instead chose to make snide remarks following the appeal decision.

Despite his interest, he demonstrates ignorance of the development proposals: shops were always in the plans from the start and the Campaign enjoys overwhelming support from local shops and the wider community. In fact, thanks to the Campaign, the plans were changed to prevent the front of the Morden Tavern from being replaced with a shop frontage saving the historical features. Additionally, the Planning Inspector has stipulated that the development must include a bar or restaurant, saving a social space of sorts for the community. The Campaign also succeeded in getting a large reduction in both the number of flats to be built and guarantees that the developer will protect the bats that live on the site.

With regards to our ‘naïve’ plans for a community cooperative to run the site, this is a successful business model being followed up and down the country and our plans were drawn up by experienced business professionals with help from members of the pub trade. We had exceeded our minimum target for potential investors and had three large pledges from local business as well as the potential for a significant low interest loan from the Cooperative Bank. The inspector could not consider our plans as they were not a planning matter.

Throughout the campaign we uncovered a number of dubious practices, through Freedom of Information Requests, showing that the Council had, at best a ramshackle sale process for Council assets and disregard for the residents of St Helier. Despite a refusal from the developer to meet with us we feel we have had a very positive influence on this development for the St Helier Community.

More than anything, the Campaign has shown that the residents of St. Helier will not allow the Council to take them for granted.

Morden Tavern defenders were 'naive' to suggest co-operative article - Wimbledon Guardian 10/10/12

Pub defenders were naive to suggest co-operative article - Wimbledon Guardian 10/10/12

http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/yoursay/yournews/wimbledon/9976178.Pub_defenders_were__naive__to_suggest_co_operative/ 

Campaigners lose the battle to save tavern article - Wimbledon Guardian 04/10/12